Friends in Home of Lords charged taxpayers greater than £46,000 on day of tributes to Prince Philip | Politics Information

Friends within the Home of Lords charged taxpayers greater than £46,000 on their day of tributes to Prince Philip.

In a Freedom of Data request by Sky Information, it was revealed that 162 friends within the higher chamber claimed a day by day allowance for 12 April.

Solely 65 of those that claimed truly made a speech to pay their respects to the Queen’s late husband.

Peers paid tribute to Prince Philip in the House of Lords on 12 April
Friends paid tribute to Prince Philip within the Home of Lords on 12 April

Friends are allowed to say a £323 allowance for every day they attend the Home of Lords, or £162 in the event that they take part nearly from house.

On 12 April, following the information of Prince Philip‘s loss of life three days earlier, proceedings within the Home of Lords have been devoted solely to greater than five-and-a-half hours of tributes.

Of the 97 friends who claimed a day by day allowance regardless of not talking within the chamber that day, 14 friends have been deputy chairmen of committees – a job that permits them to deputise for the Lord Speaker if mandatory.

An additional 52 friends are both members of a Lords committee or maintain a frontbench position for his or her events.

In the meantime, 31 friends who claimed the allowance and didn’t communicate within the chamber that day seem to haven’t any different formal position within the Lords.

The list for Prince Philip's funeral has been released
The Duke of Edinburgh died on 9 April on the age of 99. Pic: AP

Campaigners for reform of the Home of Lords claimed that some friends noticed the higher home as a “money cow”.

The Freedom of Data request additionally confirmed that two friends who spoke within the Lords chamber to ship tributes to Prince Philip claimed for the complete £323 allowance, regardless of making their speeches through video hyperlink.

And one peer claimed the complete allowance regardless of official information exhibiting they withdrew from talking within the chamber that day.

The Home of Lords stated there have been no discrepancies between the official report of friends who attended parliament in particular person on 12 April and claims for the complete £323 day by day allowance.

Darren Hughes, the chief government of the Electoral Reform Society, advised Sky Information: “That is the sort of bills scandal within the unelected Lords which simply appears to maintain repeating itself.

“Whereas many friends work onerous, too many seem to see the Lords as a money cow – eroding belief within the work of parliament as a complete.

“There may be merely no manner for voters to kick out those that fall wanting the requirements we want within the UK’s revising chamber.”

“Proper now, the Lords appears to be like extra like a personal member’s membership than the efficient scrutiny physique Britain deserves.

“The unelected Lords is devoid of accountability, and that has to alter.

“In 2021, it’s outrageous that prime ministers can appoint limitless numbers of donors, occasion figures and pals to say bills and vote on our legal guidelines for all times.”

Please use Chrome browser for a extra accessible video participant

Duke of Edinburgh laid to relaxation

At the moment, there are about 800 members who’re eligible to participate within the work of the Home of Lords.

This implies the Lords is the second-largest legislative chamber on the planet behind China’s Nationwide Folks’s Congress.

The previous Lord Speaker, Lord Fowler, final 12 months criticised Prime Minister Boris Johnson for making a raft of recent appointments to the Home of Lords to extend the variety of friends.

Throughout his time as Lord Speaker, Lord Fowler had backed efforts to scale back the dimensions of the Lords to 600 members.

There are 650 MPs within the Home of Commons.

Subscribe to the All Out Politics podcast on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify, Spreaker

A Home of Lords spokesperson advised Sky Information that friends are “liable for guaranteeing that claims they make are in accordance with the principles contained within the code of conduct” and {that a} “giant majority of members take these duties critically and undertake them with diligence”.

They stated that “any breaches can be investigated beneath the code of conduct process”.

The spokesperson added: “The sitting of the Home for tributes to the Duke of Edinburgh on Monday 12 April constituted parliamentary enterprise and so members have been allowed to say day by day attendance allowance in the event that they certified for it and wished to take action.

“Members who bodily attended Westminster on that date would have been entitled to say their full day by day attendance allowance even when they did not communicate within the chamber.

“Members who have been unable to be within the chamber resulting from capability points, however had their attendance verified in specified components of the property, have been additionally entitled to say the complete allowance in the event that they have been current when the Home was sitting.

“Members of the Home of Lords convey a wealth of expertise and experience from exterior parliament into the varied features of their position in scrutinising and bettering laws and holding the federal government to account.

“Not all of the work that members undertake and which attracts an allowance is seen – a lot of it’s performed behind the scenes together with choose committee work, researching points and assembly campaigners and members of the general public.”

Supply hyperlink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.